A Marvel Rivals player's Grandmaster I achievement prompts a reevaluation of team composition strategies. The prevailing belief favors a 2-2-2 team setup (two Vanguards, two Duelists, two Strategists), but this player contends that any team with at least one Vanguard and one Strategist is capable of victory.

This advice comes as Season 1 of Marvel Rivals approaches, with the Fantastic Four's imminent arrival generating excitement. The current Season 0 is seeing a surge in Competitive mode players, some aiming for high ranks, others targeting the Gold rank Moon Knight skin. This competitive push has highlighted frustration over teammates' reluctance to fill Vanguard or Strategist roles.

Redditor Few_Event_1719, having reached Grandmaster I, challenges the conventional wisdom. They've successfully utilized unconventional team compositions, even experimenting with a three Duelist, three Strategist setup, completely omitting Vanguards. This aligns with NetEase Games' stated intention to avoid a role queue system, a decision that pleases some players while frustrating others who encounter imbalanced teams.

The community is divided on the viability of unconventional compositions. Some argue that a single Strategist is insufficient, leaving the team vulnerable. Others support experimentation, sharing their own successes with diverse team builds. The effectiveness of a single Strategist is debated, with some noting that Strategists' damage alerts mitigate the risk.

The Competitive mode itself remains a subject of ongoing discussion. Suggestions for improvement include hero bans across all ranks to promote balance and enhance gameplay, and the removal of Seasonal Bonuses to address perceived balance issues. Despite acknowledged imperfections, the game's popularity persists, and players eagerly anticipate future developments. (Replace example.com/image1.jpg with actual image URL if available)